How we work

How a Menu Becomes a Published MenuLedger Record

Illustrative MenuLedger editorial graphic

The workflow separates source facts, structured menu data and editorial interpretation before a listing is published.

A useful menu record begins before any descriptive paragraph is written. The editor first needs to establish which restaurant location and which restaurant-published source the record represents. Only then can the menu be organized without mixing dates, branches or ordering channels.

1. Identify the strongest source

The preferred starting point is the restaurant’s own current menu or location page. An official ordering page can fill a gap when its ownership and location are clear. Third-party directories are secondary and should not silently override direct restaurant information.

The source is saved with the record. This makes a later review possible and helps separate a verified fact from an editorial observation.

2. Match the location

Address, telephone number and branch name are compared before menu entry. A multi-location brand may need several records. The editor does not assume that a menu, price or schedule applies everywhere simply because the logo is the same.

3. Preserve the menu’s logic

Sections are entered in a form that follows the published menu. A focused six-pizza menu should remain focused. A larger delicatessen menu may need separate groups for hot sandwiches, breakfast, grill items, soups, sides and desserts.

Item names, descriptions, prices and price notes are separate fields. This matters when one amount applies to a cup, personal pizza or lunch portion while other sizes are listed in a note.

4. Leave uncertainty visible

Missing prices remain blank. Market-price wording stays a note. An older official PDF can support item names and structure without being presented as a verified current price list. Home Slice is an example in the current dataset: the older official menu helped establish sections, while its older amounts were not republished as current figures.

Franklin Barbecue shows another kind of limit. Its official pages confirmed the location, service pattern and menu groups, while the accessible source did not provide a dependable current amount for every smoked meat. Those fields remain empty.

5. Add analysis after the facts

Editorial text should help a reader understand the record. It can explain that one section dominates the menu, that several items use size notes, or that only part of the menu has fixed prices. It cannot invent popularity, flavor, atmosphere or a personal visit.

Price snapshots are calculated only from stored numeric values. A minimum and maximum are menu endpoints, not an average meal cost. Items without a fixed amount are counted separately.

6. Record the review date

The verification date answers one narrow question: when was the cited source checked? A punctuation edit does not move that date. A new date is appropriate only after another source review.

7. Publish corrections carefully

Reader and owner corrections enter a private queue. They are not copied directly onto the public page. The relevant source is checked, the structured field is updated when warranted, and the verification note records any useful limitation.

This workflow is intentionally cautious. It produces fewer confident-looking claims, but the remaining information is easier to trace and maintain.